The Idiot Review Essay Example

The Idiot Review Paper Essay on The Idiot Crime and Punishment one of the few nedochitannyh until the end of the books from the curriculum, I was only enough for the first hundred pages. Dostoyevskys literary greatness for me it was an axiom, has not yet been tested on their own experience. Over time, I realized that reading is a very large body of literature is simply impossible without the creation of Fyodor Mikhailovich, and with trembling chosen book for revenge. I was expecting from The Idiot a lot and the first shock was the fascination of the story, I read avidly. It would seem that a large static scenes, long monologues, author retreat but, starting from the first meeting of Myshkin and Rogozhin in the train, it is impossible to break away. Roman found himself accessible and interesting, although it was written over a century ago and is full of philosophical meaning. It is very clear structure of the novel, the action moves from one salon to another. Will the authors characters get together, the stress increases, the conflict is heating up and there is an emotional outburst and further development. Decisive evening at Nastasya Filippovna, a farewell letter to Hippolytus, attack Prince at a reception the strongest on the effects on the scene of the reader. Dostoevsky confronts the characters, bringing them to hysteria, to disclose the nature We will write a custom essay sample on The Idiot Review specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on The Idiot Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on The Idiot Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Each of the characters -. It is a special world, rich, rich, contradictory. All the features of their brought to an extreme degree, when the character becomes almost a parody of its own type. In Rogozhin and Nastasia I just fell in love. Nastasia character, impassioned self-punishment and destruction. She calls herself a dissolute and corrupt and refuses happiness, despise its existence, and in the next moment is aware of his innocence and turning against their persecutors. Parfen Rogozhin, passion exalts him, pulling out of his father bequeathed to life, and shes crazy and destroys. His dark obsession, gaps in the conversation with the prince, stubborn pursuit, rejection of himself, unwavering loyalty, jealousy is terrible it is terrible, but it does not cause negative emotions. Nastasia and Parfen seen me two gigantic figures, both low and elevated, the executioner and the victim, which are constantly changing roles. Their union it is high tragedy, confrontation, pain, tearing the soul, and it is clear that, as with any tragedy, the outcome can only be one Aglaia extremely contradictory, she is beautiful and intelligent, and. good, but immensely spoiled, headstrong and proud so that makes Prince suffer, and can not accept his resignation. Lizaveta Prokofyevna truly direct child misbehaved and then forgive prigolubit, valued position in society, but quickly forgets about it and realizes the emptiness and futility of secular life. Hippolytus, a dying embittered young man, eager to acceptance by the other, but he repels them, another soul is full of contradictions. General Ivolgin funny in his stories, he is miserable and sorry for him, because, perhaps, he says sometimes the truth. Lebedev, endlessly telling lies and repentant servant set of masters. Ordinary people Gan and Barbara Ivolgina trying to break out of their own limitations, not sparing with the means and others. Dostoevsky shows the state of the society of the XIX century, with its inherent vices and evils, but at the same time the characters of these so typically Russian, s o alive, that are relevant and they are now The most beautiful thing the characters, so different:. And ordinary and outstanding, and the noble and ignoble illum (I) til Prince Myshkin. He saw the best in people features, and after it does not want to consider or Ganechku Lebedev scoundrels. Amazing feeling compassion for the heroes of the last character to understand and forgive. Prince Myshkin a perfect positive character of Dostoevsky, but how can it be put on a par with other characters? Prince is not just a character in a literary work, is the embodiment of Christian virtue in modern society, the author. Such a person is immensely difficult, because it is very different from the rest. His generosity, wit, spontaneity, a critical attitude to himself and acceptance of others, compassion, alas, can not find a place in everyday life. Myshkin has a heavy cross fool, takes upon himself the sins of society and redeems them. The essence of the Duke of relations with Nastasya Filippovna reflected in the stories of Marie, but i f in Switzerland Myshkin managed to find reconciliation and peace, because children are more vopriimchivy goodness and compassion, then in St. Petersburg, his self-sacrifice leads to a tragic end. Fedor Mihajlovic shows the two faces of love Christian charity, love of neighbor and fatal passion. Pride and passion blinded them destroy people and others, but humility and compassion, righteous living, and live help alleviate suffering, so only people able to take such a choice is very small. The tragedy of the book lies in the fact that none of these ways does not lead to happiness heroes. But there is one day a cure that does not make the book too heavy it is an irony that softens everything and reconciles with reality Read and reread.. Laugh and cry, to experience again and again, and believe the wise Prince Myshkin, that each soul has a bright flame.